Draft #1 Argumentative Essay
Yanna
Sanchez
Ms.
Nargiza Matyakuboya
English
21003. Section M
3
October, 2017
Draft
#1 Argumentative Essay
Censorship in Science?
The Controversy on Embryonic Cell
Research
Abstract
The study of stem cell research
broaden biological scientific knowledge.
Researchers have many advances towards curing what was once believed to
be uncurable diseases in studying embryonic research. This research would benefit every one, for
the creation of new drugs, methods, and knowledge. However, embryonic stem cells are derived
from fertilized eggs bringing up many moral and ethical issues to many
individuals. In 2004, the embryonic stem
cell research was explored and debated amongst the Subcommittee on Science,
Technology, and Space and the United States Senate. This hearing ended with scientist being able
to continue to explore research the limitless knowledge being discovered in
stem cell research the potential benefits.
In 2010, however another hearing was conducted to increase government
funds to continue the research.
The possibilities embryonic stem
cell research offers are endless.
Researchers believe that this research will shed light on basic understanding
of diseases, disorders, and can even aid in correcting injuries sustained from
accidents. Huntington’s disease, a
late-onset neurodegenerative disease, is believed to be curable with further
research into embryonic stem cell research.
This research may also be responsible for the treatment of Fragile X
syndrome, a developmental disability, and Rett syndrome, a debilitating brain
disorder. This controversy of embryonic
stem cell research involved several other controversies that are still debatable
and involve subjective stances on the matters.
The controversy of where does life begin? Is brought up in the
discussion. The other controversy
brought up is the acceptance of cloning of embryos. There are many individuals who believe this
research goes again ethical and religious views on how far is the field willing
to push boundaries to better humankind. Therefore,
the benefits of embryonic stem cell research are found to have great importance
to futuristic biological knowledge, medical advances, and providing people with
hope.
Embryonic Stem Cell research will be
able to deepen knowledge on basic fundamentals of life. Francis S. Collins the Director of National
Institute of Health in charge of the Department of Health and Human Services
states that the research being conducted allows for the understanding of the
molecular pathways and the development of diseases (8). This deep understanding well be able to allow
researchers to develop and create methods that will treat and cure diseases and
disorders, and in turn will provide the benefiting individuals with a better
quality of life. The researchers have
been using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS), which were created on the
information gathered from embryonic stem cells.
However, the study on the iPS stem cells still lack the information the
embryonic cells provide. The creation of
the cells has led to a clinical benefit in avoiding transplant rejection, since
they can be derived directly from the patient (Collins, 8). However, the comparisons between the iPS
cells and the embryonic cells continue to hold much differences, and
researchers are still unsure if the differences will make a difference in a
clinical setting is still unknown. Thus,
to truly know more the potential embryonic stem cells have on the molecular
level are yet unknown, and must be researched further.
Embryonic
Stem Cell research also provides many advances in regenerative medicine. Embryonic Stem Cells are pluripotent cells,
which means that they can become any cell in the human body, and they are self-
renewing so they can reproduce endlessly (Collins 7). This fact, enables researchers to share the
cells with other researchers in other facilities to conduct their own
research. This study is said to generate
spinal cord cells, which means that individuals who have suffered a traumatic
accident and have severed their spinal and are paralyzed can be treated, and
maybe even cured. In the figure Human
Embryonic Stem Cells, we see how the pluripotent cells can literally be created
into the following: neurons the method of communication between the brain and
the rest of the body, pancreatic cells that can potentially allow a pancreas to
produce healthy tissue, bone cells, and heart cells. Therefore, it is evident that research on
human embryonic cells is very important.
Figure 1 Human
Embryonic Stem Cell Courtesy of Francis S. Collins Director of NIH Department
of Health and Human Services p.17
Another important aspect of
embryonic stem cells, is that this research and findings give people hope to a
better future. Francis Collins brings
this letter to the hearing held with the Senate in 2010:
I have held my breath with hope
that my sons would benefit from the early stem cell research. I watched as American scientists and science
fell further behind on the global scene during the past decade. In 2009, I had such hope that once again our
medical schools and universities would begin to attract the best and brightest
young minds to work in this exciting and promising area of research.
This week’s news was devastating to
me. I had no idea how strongly I would
be affected by it. Your message of support
for the research once again gives me hope, hope that there will be change, hope
that we will see effective treatments in our lifetimes for these devastating
diseases.
This
was a letter written by a mother whose sons suffer from type 1 diabetes, while
she suffers from Parkinson’s disease, a central nervous system disorder that
affect movement and with time will worsen.
Both of these diseases can potentially be cured if proper research were
dedicated to the research of Embryonic Stem Cells.
However, because of the nature in
which the embryonic cells are created many individuals feel that it is
important to consider the ethical issues behind human embryo research. In the Embryonic
Stem Cell Research: Exploring the Controversy Richard M. Doerlflinger Deputy
Director, Secretariat for Pro- Life Activities, U.S. Conference of Catholic
Bishops, states “human life and dignity must not be trampled on in the pursuit
of medical knowledge useful to others” (11).
He claims that the progress of medicine while destroying a human is
inhuman, creating a paradox being involved in the issue. Dr. Laurie Zoloth states that no one can
really determine “when life begins” because it is not a fixed biological
question. Therefore, the claim against
the research is misplaced and to actually answer this question further research
on embryo would need to be conducted.
Many individuals also claim that
this research goes again moral rights.
Doerlflinger claims that regardless to what scientist impose the
embryo’s to be life begins with that one celled zygote, a fertilized egg. However, Dr. Zoloth states that morally
people with all back grounds and beliefs believe that it is “morally imperative”
that research is conducted to use blastocysts, a further developed embryo, to create
the stem cell lines that enable the researched to “save lives” (7).
People also state that the Embryonic
Stem Cell Research is also a “slippery ethical slop” in other
controversies. Richard claims that
allowing institutions to conduct such research opens the door to even more
ethical controversies surrounding the concept of cloning and destroying
embryos. However, Dr. Daley states in “Embryonic
Stem-Cell Research”, in The New England Journal of Medicine, that
stem cells provide unique opportunities for science and medicine, enabling
researchers to investigate basic mechanisms of human development. This is way this is also a political issue in
regards to how legislation should handle these unprecedented informations.
Therefore, Embryonic Stem Cell
testing is important to the further advancement medical research to better the
lives of millions of people, to the deeper understanding of many diseases, and
disorders, this research is also important to providing people with hope to a
better tomorrow. Based on benefits of
embryonic stem cell research and the reasons why this is our best option
towards better medicine, methods, and treatments there should be unrestricted limits
to the research being conducted that can ultimately change everyones
lives.
Works Cited
"Citizens weigh
in." Nature, vol. 502, no. 7473, 2013, p. 598. Academic
OneFile, go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=cuny_ccny&v=2.1&id=GALE%7CA350978145&it=r&asid=b9b467d7a90e9d48951a1c1272b09911.
Accessed 29 Sept. 2017.
“Embryonic Stem-Cell
Research.” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 17, 2004,
pp. 1797–1798.
June, Patricia L. “Embryonic Stem
Cell Research. (Letters to the Editor).(Letter to the
Editor).” Pediatrics, vol. 109, no. 5, 2002, pp. 990–1.
Kondro, Wayne. “Court Upholds
Funding of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.” CMAJ: Canadian Medical
Association Journal, vol. 184, no. 14, 2012, pp. E749–E750.
Moon, Seongwuk, and Seong Beom Cho.
"Differential impact of science policy on subfields of human embryonic
stem cell research." PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 4, 2014. Academic OneFile,
go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=cuny_ccny&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA375582401&asid=3e3fd7fc714c691e51180e7e71faeb43.
Accessed 29 Sept. 2017.
"Stem-cell
finale." Nature, vol. 493, no. 7431, 2013, p. 138. Academic
OneFile, go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=cuny_ccny&v=2.1&id=GALE%7CA314651836&it=r&asid=eddfb3cbacdd6d40da894d527adefdb8.
Accessed 29 Sept. 2017.
United States. Congress. Senate.
Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Departments of Labor, Health Human
Services, Education, Related Agencies. The Promise of Human Embryonic Stem
Cell Research Hearing before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations,
United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, Second Session, Special
Hearing, September 16, 2010, Washington, DC. Washington, U.S. G.P.O.,
2011.
United States. Congress. Senate.
Committee on Commerce, Science, Transportation. Subcommittee on Science,
Technology, Space, author. Embryonic Stem Cell Research : Exploring the
Controversy : Hearing before the Subcommittee on Science, Technology, and Space
of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States
Senate, One Hundred Eighth Congress, Second Session, September 29,
2004. 2013.
Comments
Post a Comment